Infused with tuna vs Wild Alaska Pink Salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Infused with tuna
Wild Alaska Pink Salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Infused with tuna and Wild Alaska Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Infused with tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 6 more calories per 100g than Wild Alaska Pink Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Infused with tuna contains significantly more sugar (2.5g) compared to the milder Wild Alaska Pink Salmon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Alaska Pink Salmon is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Infused with tuna or Wild Alaska Pink Salmon?
It depends on your goals. Infused with tuna has 100 calories, while Wild Alaska Pink Salmon has 94.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Infused with tuna vegan?
No, Infused with tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Infused with tuna and Wild Alaska Pink Salmon?
There is a difference of 6 calories per 100g between the two products.
