Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrales cacau vs Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Integrales cacau

Integrales cacau

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce

Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
424 kcal
Energy
45 kcal
28g
Sugars
0g
14g
Fat
0g
9.3g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Integrales cacau and Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Integrales cacau is the more energy-dense option here, packing 379 more calories per 100g than Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Integrales cacau contains significantly more sugar (28g) compared to the milder Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Integrales cacau offers a protein boost with 9.3g per 100g, outperforming Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Integrales cacau or Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce?

It depends on your goals. Integrales cacau has 424 calories, while Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce has 45 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Integrales cacau vegan?

No, Integrales cacau is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Integrales cacau and Mott's Granny Smith Unsweetened applesauce?

There is a difference of 379 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.