Jack link s beef jerky original vs Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Jack link s beef jerky original

Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Jack link s beef jerky original and Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Jack link s beef jerky original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 186 more calories per 100g than Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Jack link s beef jerky original contains significantly more sugar (21.428571428571g) compared to the milder Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites (5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Jack link s beef jerky original offers a protein boost with 39.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Jack link s beef jerky original or Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites?
It depends on your goals. Jack link s beef jerky original has 285.71428571429 calories, while Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Jack link s beef jerky original vegan?
No, Jack link s beef jerky original is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Jack link s beef jerky original and Chocolatey Coated Peanut Butter Crispy Rice Bites?
There is a difference of 186 calories per 100g between the two products.




