Head-to-Head Analysis

Jack links beef tender strips vs Brownie Crisp cookie thins

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Jack links beef tender strips

Jack links beef tender strips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Brownie Crisp cookie thins

Brownie Crisp cookie thins

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357.1 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
30g
21.4g
Fat
20g
39.3g
Protein
3.3g
4.2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jack links beef tender strips and Brownie Crisp cookie thins side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Jack links beef tender strips is the clear winner. With 76 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Jack links beef tender strips takes the lead with only 7.1428571428571g of sugar per 100g, whereas Brownie Crisp cookie thins contains 30g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Jack links beef tender strips offers a protein boost with 39.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Brownie Crisp cookie thins in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jack links beef tender strips or Brownie Crisp cookie thins?

Jack links beef tender strips appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Jack links beef tender strips vegan?

No, Jack links beef tender strips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jack links beef tender strips and Brownie Crisp cookie thins?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.