Jack links beef tender strips vs dum_dums
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Jack links beef tender strips
dum_dums
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Jack links beef tender strips and dum_dums side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Jack links beef tender strips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 307 more calories per 100g than dum_dums. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Jack links beef tender strips takes the lead with only 7.1428571428571g of sugar per 100g, whereas dum_dums contains 9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Jack links beef tender strips offers a protein boost with 39.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming dum_dums in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Jack links beef tender strips or dum_dums?
It depends on your goals. Jack links beef tender strips has 357.14285714286 calories, while dum_dums has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Jack links beef tender strips vegan?
No, Jack links beef tender strips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Jack links beef tender strips and dum_dums?
There is a difference of 307 calories per 100g between the two products.
