JAR Beef Jerky vs Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
JAR Beef Jerky
Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing JAR Beef Jerky and Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, JAR Beef Jerky is the clear winner. With 290 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. JAR Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (1.75g) compared to the milder Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? JAR Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 49.1g per 100g, outperforming Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: JAR Beef Jerky or Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips?
It depends on your goals. JAR Beef Jerky has 246 calories, while Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is JAR Beef Jerky vegan?
No, JAR Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between JAR Beef Jerky and Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips?
There is a difference of 290 calories per 100g between the two products.
