Head-to-Head Analysis

Jumbo Beef Franks vs Zero Sugar Hard Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jumbo Beef Franks

Jumbo Beef Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Zero Sugar Hard Candy

Zero Sugar Hard Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
259 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
21.2g
Fat
0g
12.9g
Protein
0g
2.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jumbo Beef Franks and Zero Sugar Hard Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Jumbo Beef Franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 259 more calories per 100g than Zero Sugar Hard Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jumbo Beef Franks contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Zero Sugar Hard Candy (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Zero Sugar Hard Candy is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Jumbo Beef Franks offers a protein boost with 12.9g per 100g, outperforming Zero Sugar Hard Candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jumbo Beef Franks or Zero Sugar Hard Candy?

It depends on your goals. Jumbo Beef Franks has 259 calories, while Zero Sugar Hard Candy has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jumbo Beef Franks vegan?

No, Jumbo Beef Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jumbo Beef Franks and Zero Sugar Hard Candy?

There is a difference of 259 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.