Head-to-Head Analysis

Kamoka vs Licorice Soft Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kamoka

Kamoka

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Licorice Soft Original

Licorice Soft Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
50g
5g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kamoka and Licorice Soft Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kamoka is the more energy-dense option here, packing 34 more calories per 100g than Licorice Soft Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kamoka takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Licorice Soft Original contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kamoka offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Licorice Soft Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kamoka or Licorice Soft Original?

It depends on your goals. Kamoka has 367 calories, while Licorice Soft Original has 333.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kamoka vegan?

No, Kamoka is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kamoka and Licorice Soft Original?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.