Head-to-Head Analysis

Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon vs Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon

Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
351 kcal
Energy
518 kcal
35.1g
Sugars
4.7g
9.5g
Fat
28.2g
5.4g
Protein
7.1g
0.8g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon and Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon is the clear winner. With 167 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon contains significantly more sugar (35.1g) compared to the milder Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips (4.71g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon or Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon has 351 calories, while Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 518 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon vegan?

No, Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kellog's Nutrigrain Apple Cinnamon and Hickory Barbeque Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.