Head-to-Head Analysis

Kind dark chocolate nut vs Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kind dark chocolate nut

Kind dark chocolate nut

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack

Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
403.8 kcal
16g
Sugars
36.5g
34g
Fat
13.5g
24g
Protein
21.2g
0.6g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kind dark chocolate nut and Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kind dark chocolate nut is the more energy-dense option here, packing 76 more calories per 100g than Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kind dark chocolate nut takes the lead with only 16g of sugar per 100g, whereas Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack contains 36.538461538462g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kind dark chocolate nut offers a protein boost with 24g per 100g, outperforming Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kind dark chocolate nut or Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack?

It depends on your goals. Kind dark chocolate nut has 480 calories, while Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack has 403.84615384615 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kind dark chocolate nut vegan?

No, Kind dark chocolate nut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kind dark chocolate nut and Larabar protein apple cobbler multipack?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.