Kirkland Burnt Ends vs Chíaluka
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kirkland Burnt Ends
Chíaluka
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kirkland Burnt Ends and Chíaluka side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Burnt Ends is the clear winner. With 55 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Burnt Ends takes the lead with only 5.95g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chíaluka contains 41.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Burnt Ends offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming Chíaluka in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kirkland Burnt Ends or Chíaluka?
Kirkland Burnt Ends appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Kirkland Burnt Ends vegan?
No, Kirkland Burnt Ends is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Burnt Ends and Chíaluka?
There is a difference of 55 calories per 100g between the two products.
