Head-to-Head Analysis

Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate vs Orbit Wintermint slim pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate

Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Orbit Wintermint slim pack

Orbit Wintermint slim pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
513 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
30.8g
Sugars
0g
25.6g
Fat
0g
5.1g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate and Orbit Wintermint slim pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 508 more calories per 100g than Orbit Wintermint slim pack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (30.8g) compared to the milder Orbit Wintermint slim pack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orbit Wintermint slim pack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate offers a protein boost with 5.13g per 100g, outperforming Orbit Wintermint slim pack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate or Orbit Wintermint slim pack?

It depends on your goals. Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate has 513 calories, while Orbit Wintermint slim pack has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate vegan?

No, Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Koala's March - Bitter Chocolate and Orbit Wintermint slim pack?

There is a difference of 508 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.