Head-to-Head Analysis

KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries vs Mandarin Oranges

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries

KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mandarin Oranges

Mandarin Oranges

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
267 kcal
Energy
66 kcal
23.3g
Sugars
15.6g
20g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries and Mandarin Oranges side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries is the more energy-dense option here, packing 201 more calories per 100g than Mandarin Oranges. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries contains significantly more sugar (23.3g) compared to the milder Mandarin Oranges (15.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mandarin Oranges is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Mandarin Oranges in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries or Mandarin Oranges?

It depends on your goals. KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries has 267 calories, while Mandarin Oranges has 66 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries vegan?

No, KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between KroFro Dark Chocolate Covered Raspberries and Mandarin Oranges?

There is a difference of 201 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.