Head-to-Head Analysis

La costena mole vs Organic real french vinaigrette dressing

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of La costena mole

La costena mole

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic real french vinaigrette dressing

Organic real french vinaigrette dressing

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
476.2 kcal
Energy
434.5 kcal
53.6g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
48.3g
6g
Protein
0g
2.8g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing La costena mole and Organic real french vinaigrette dressing side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

La costena mole is the more energy-dense option here, packing 42 more calories per 100g than Organic real french vinaigrette dressing. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. La costena mole contains significantly more sugar (53.571428571429g) compared to the milder Organic real french vinaigrette dressing (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic real french vinaigrette dressing is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? La costena mole offers a protein boost with 5.952380952381g per 100g, outperforming Organic real french vinaigrette dressing in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: La costena mole or Organic real french vinaigrette dressing?

It depends on your goals. La costena mole has 476.19047619048 calories, while Organic real french vinaigrette dressing has 434.4828 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is La costena mole vegan?

No, La costena mole is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between La costena mole and Organic real french vinaigrette dressing?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.