Head-to-Head Analysis

Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham vs Beef Franks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham

Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beef Franks

Beef Franks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
115.4 kcal
Energy
321 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
1.9g
3.8g
Fat
28.3g
17.3g
Protein
11.3g
2.5g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham and Beef Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham is the clear winner. With 206 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham offers a protein boost with 17.307692307692g per 100g, outperforming Beef Franks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham or Beef Franks?

It depends on your goals. Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham has 115.38461538462 calories, while Beef Franks has 321 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham vegan?

No, Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham and Beef Franks?

There is a difference of 206 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.