Head-to-Head Analysis

Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon vs Cod Skinless Fillets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon

Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cod Skinless Fillets

Cod Skinless Fillets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
193 kcal
Energy
71.4 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
10.5g
Fat
0g
19.3g
Protein
15.2g
2.9g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon and Cod Skinless Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 122 more calories per 100g than Cod Skinless Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon contains significantly more sugar (1.75g) compared to the milder Cod Skinless Fillets (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cod Skinless Fillets is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon offers a protein boost with 19.3g per 100g, outperforming Cod Skinless Fillets in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon or Cod Skinless Fillets?

It depends on your goals. Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon has 192.98 calories, while Cod Skinless Fillets has 71.4285714285714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon vegan?

No, Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon and Cod Skinless Fillets?

There is a difference of 122 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.