Head-to-Head Analysis

Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour vs Wavy original potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour

Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wavy original potato chips

Wavy original potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
435 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
58.2g
Sugars
3.6g
10g
Fat
39.3g
5.9g
Protein
3.6g
0.3g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour and Wavy original potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour is the clear winner. With 136 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour contains significantly more sugar (58.2g) compared to the milder Wavy original potato chips (3.57143g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wavy original potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour offers a protein boost with 5.88g per 100g, outperforming Wavy original potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour or Wavy original potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour has 435 calories, while Wavy original potato chips has 571.42857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour vegan?

No, Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Latte Matcha Strawberry Flavour and Wavy original potato chips?

There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.