Head-to-Head Analysis

Lay's Classic potato chips vs Almond Malk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lay's Classic potato chips

Lay's Classic potato chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Almond Malk

Almond Malk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
25 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
35.7g
Fat
1.9g
7.1g
Protein
0.8g
1.5g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lay's Classic potato chips and Almond Malk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lay's Classic potato chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 546 more calories per 100g than Almond Malk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lay's Classic potato chips contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Almond Malk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Almond Malk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Lay's Classic potato chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Almond Malk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lay's Classic potato chips or Almond Malk?

It depends on your goals. Lay's Classic potato chips has 571 calories, while Almond Malk has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lay's Classic potato chips vegan?

No, Lay's Classic potato chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lay's Classic potato chips and Almond Malk?

There is a difference of 546 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.