Leche de coco condensada vs Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Leche de coco condensada
Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Leche de coco condensada and Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Leche de coco condensada is the more energy-dense option here, packing 3 more calories per 100g than Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Leche de coco condensada contains significantly more sugar (60.5g) compared to the milder Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Leche de coco condensada or Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta?
It depends on your goals. Leche de coco condensada has 342 calories, while Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta has 339 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Leche de coco condensada vegan?
No, Leche de coco condensada is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Leche de coco condensada and Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta?
There is a difference of 3 calories per 100g between the two products.
