Head-to-Head Analysis

LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint vs Ritz crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint

LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ritz crackers

Ritz crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
73.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint and Ritz crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint is the more energy-dense option here, packing 400 more calories per 100g than Ritz crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint contains significantly more sugar (73.333333333333g) compared to the milder Ritz crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ritz crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint or Ritz crackers?

It depends on your goals. LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint has 400 calories, while Ritz crackers has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint vegan?

No, LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint and Ritz crackers?

There is a difference of 400 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.