Head-to-Head Analysis

Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green vs Rice Krispies Treats

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green

Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Rice Krispies Treats

Rice Krispies Treats

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
409 kcal
85.7g
Sugars
36.4g
0g
Fat
9.1g
0g
Protein
4.6g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green and Rice Krispies Treats side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green is the clear winner. With 123 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green contains significantly more sugar (85.714285714286g) compared to the milder Rice Krispies Treats (36.4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Rice Krispies Treats is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green or Rice Krispies Treats?

It depends on your goals. Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green has 285.71428571429 calories, while Rice Krispies Treats has 409 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green vegan?

No, Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green and Rice Krispies Treats?

There is a difference of 123 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.