Head-to-Head Analysis

Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice vs Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice

Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon

Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
8.7 kcal
Energy
123 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
3.5g
0g
Protein
22.8g
0g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice and Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice contains significantly more sugar (2.17g) compared to the milder Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice or Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice has 8.67 calories, while Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon has 123 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice vegan?

No, Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Light Cranberry & Concord Grape Juice and Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.