Head-to-Head Analysis

Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vs Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry

Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
208 kcal
Energy
121 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
10.4g
Fat
5g
25g
Protein
3.6g
2.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 87 more calories per 100g than Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese or Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry?

It depends on your goals. Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 208 calories, while Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry has 121 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vegan?

No, Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Light Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Whole Milk French Style Yogurt Strawberry?

There is a difference of 87 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.