Head-to-Head Analysis

Light Tuna in water vs Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Light Tuna in water

Light Tuna in water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon

Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
112.7 kcal
Energy
125 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.4g
Fat
3.6g
22.5g
Protein
21.4g
0.7g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Light Tuna in water and Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Light Tuna in water is the clear winner. With 12 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Light Tuna in water or Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Light Tuna in water has 112.67605633803 calories, while Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Light Tuna in water vegan?

No, Light Tuna in water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Light Tuna in water and Alaskan Smoked Sockeye Salmon?

There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.