Head-to-Head Analysis

Light Tuna in water vs Wild Alaska Pink Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Light Tuna in water

Light Tuna in water

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Alaska Pink Salmon

Wild Alaska Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
112.7 kcal
Energy
94.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.4g
Fat
1.8g
22.5g
Protein
20g
0.7g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Light Tuna in water and Wild Alaska Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Light Tuna in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 19 more calories per 100g than Wild Alaska Pink Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Light Tuna in water offers a protein boost with 22.535211267606g per 100g, outperforming Wild Alaska Pink Salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Light Tuna in water or Wild Alaska Pink Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Light Tuna in water has 112.67605633803 calories, while Wild Alaska Pink Salmon has 94.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Light Tuna in water vegan?

No, Light Tuna in water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Light Tuna in water and Wild Alaska Pink Salmon?

There is a difference of 19 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.