Head-to-Head Analysis

Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag vs Pitted Dates

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag

Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pitted Dates

Pitted Dates

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
638.9 kcal
Energy
275 kcal
38.9g
Sugars
72.5g
50g
Fat
0g
5.6g
Protein
2.5g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag and Pitted Dates side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag is the more energy-dense option here, packing 364 more calories per 100g than Pitted Dates. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag takes the lead with only 38.888888888889g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pitted Dates contains 72.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag offers a protein boost with 5.5555555555556g per 100g, outperforming Pitted Dates in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag or Pitted Dates?

It depends on your goals. Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag has 638.88888888889 calories, while Pitted Dates has 275 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag vegan?

No, Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lindor holiday assorted chocolate truffles bag and Pitted Dates?

There is a difference of 364 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.