Head-to-Head Analysis

Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt vs Completeats cherry almond cookie

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt

Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Completeats cherry almond cookie

Completeats cherry almond cookie

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
611 kcal
Energy
439 kcal
38.9g
Sugars
29.8g
47.2g
Fat
28.1g
5.6g
Protein
12.3g
0.5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt and Completeats cherry almond cookie side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 172 more calories per 100g than Completeats cherry almond cookie. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt contains significantly more sugar (38.9g) compared to the milder Completeats cherry almond cookie (29.8g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Completeats cherry almond cookie is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt or Completeats cherry almond cookie?

It depends on your goals. Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt has 611 calories, while Completeats cherry almond cookie has 439 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt vegan?

No, Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lindor milk chocolate truffles sea salt and Completeats cherry almond cookie?

There is a difference of 172 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.