Head-to-Head Analysis

Low fat chocolate milk vs Sliced Gouda

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low fat chocolate milk

Low fat chocolate milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Gouda

Sliced Gouda

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
68 kcal
Energy
368.4 kcal
11.2g
Sugars
0g
1.2g
Fat
26.3g
3.2g
Protein
26.3g
0.2g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low fat chocolate milk and Sliced Gouda side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Low fat chocolate milk is the clear winner. With 300 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Low fat chocolate milk contains significantly more sugar (11.2g) compared to the milder Sliced Gouda (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Gouda is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low fat chocolate milk or Sliced Gouda?

It depends on your goals. Low fat chocolate milk has 68 calories, while Sliced Gouda has 368.421052631579 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low fat chocolate milk vegan?

No, Low fat chocolate milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low fat chocolate milk and Sliced Gouda?

There is a difference of 300 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.