Head-to-Head Analysis

Low-Moisture Part Skim vs Burrata

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low-Moisture Part Skim

Low-Moisture Part Skim

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Burrata

Burrata

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
250 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
21.4g
25g
Protein
10.7g
1.9g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low-Moisture Part Skim and Burrata side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Low-Moisture Part Skim is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Burrata. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Low-Moisture Part Skim offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Burrata in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low-Moisture Part Skim or Burrata?

It depends on your goals. Low-Moisture Part Skim has 285.71 calories, while Burrata has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low-Moisture Part Skim vegan?

No, Low-Moisture Part Skim is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low-Moisture Part Skim and Burrata?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.