Head-to-Head Analysis

Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) vs Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)

Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
275 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
0g
6g
Fat
22.5g
16.1g
Protein
18.8g
1.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) and Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) is the clear winner. With 150 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) or Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel?

It depends on your goals. Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) has 125 calories, while Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel has 275 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) vegan?

No, Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) and Fillets Mediterranean Style Mackerel?

There is a difference of 150 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.