Mackerel Fillets vs Ruffles Queso chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Mackerel Fillets
Ruffles Queso chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Mackerel Fillets and Ruffles Queso chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Mackerel Fillets is the clear winner. With 247 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Mackerel Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ruffles Queso chips contains 3.5714285714286g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Mackerel Fillets offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Ruffles Queso chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Mackerel Fillets or Ruffles Queso chips?
Mackerel Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Mackerel Fillets vegan?
No, Mackerel Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Mackerel Fillets and Ruffles Queso chips?
There is a difference of 247 calories per 100g between the two products.
