Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple flavor pork sausage vs Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple flavor pork sausage

Maple flavor pork sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs

Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
380 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
6g
Sugars
0g
34g
Fat
0g
12g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple flavor pork sausage and Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple flavor pork sausage is the more energy-dense option here, packing 380 more calories per 100g than Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple flavor pork sausage contains significantly more sugar (6g) compared to the milder Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple flavor pork sausage offers a protein boost with 12g per 100g, outperforming Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple flavor pork sausage or Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs?

It depends on your goals. Maple flavor pork sausage has 380 calories, while Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple flavor pork sausage vegan?

No, Maple flavor pork sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple flavor pork sausage and Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs?

There is a difference of 380 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.