Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites vs Wild caught alaska cod

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites

Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild caught alaska cod

Wild caught alaska cod

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
70.5 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
0.9g
32.1g
Protein
15g
4.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites and Wild caught alaska cod side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites is the more energy-dense option here, packing 287 more calories per 100g than Wild caught alaska cod. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites contains significantly more sugar (21.4g) compared to the milder Wild caught alaska cod (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild caught alaska cod is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites offers a protein boost with 32.1g per 100g, outperforming Wild caught alaska cod in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites or Wild caught alaska cod?

It depends on your goals. Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites has 357 calories, while Wild caught alaska cod has 70.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites vegan?

No, Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites and Wild caught alaska cod?

There is a difference of 287 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.