Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies vs Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies

Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry

Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
457 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
45g
20g
Fat
0g
5.7g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies and Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 157 more calories per 100g than Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies takes the lead with only 28.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry contains 45g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies offers a protein boost with 5.71g per 100g, outperforming Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies or Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry?

It depends on your goals. Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies has 457 calories, while Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies vegan?

No, Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple Leaves Maple Sugar Cookies and Fruit Minis Raspberry/Blueberry?

There is a difference of 157 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.