Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple pecan clusters cereal vs Handheld Chicken Pot Pies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple pecan clusters cereal

Maple pecan clusters cereal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Handheld Chicken Pot Pies

Handheld Chicken Pot Pies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
434 kcal
Energy
224 kcal
20.8g
Sugars
2g
13.2g
Fat
8.6g
7.5g
Protein
5.5g
0.7g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple pecan clusters cereal and Handheld Chicken Pot Pies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple pecan clusters cereal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 210 more calories per 100g than Handheld Chicken Pot Pies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple pecan clusters cereal contains significantly more sugar (20.754716981132g) compared to the milder Handheld Chicken Pot Pies (1.96g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Handheld Chicken Pot Pies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple pecan clusters cereal offers a protein boost with 7.5471698113208g per 100g, outperforming Handheld Chicken Pot Pies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple pecan clusters cereal or Handheld Chicken Pot Pies?

It depends on your goals. Maple pecan clusters cereal has 433.96226415094 calories, while Handheld Chicken Pot Pies has 224 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple pecan clusters cereal vegan?

No, Maple pecan clusters cereal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple pecan clusters cereal and Handheld Chicken Pot Pies?

There is a difference of 210 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.