Matcha vs Captiva; Dark Chocolate
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Matcha
Captiva; Dark Chocolate
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Matcha and Captiva; Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Matcha is the clear winner. With 26 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Matcha takes the lead with only 10.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas Captiva; Dark Chocolate contains 38.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Matcha offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Captiva; Dark Chocolate in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Matcha or Captiva; Dark Chocolate?
Matcha appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Matcha vegan?
No, Matcha is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Matcha and Captiva; Dark Chocolate?
There is a difference of 26 calories per 100g between the two products.
