Matcha vs Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Matcha
Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Matcha and Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Matcha is the clear winner. With 513 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Matcha takes the lead with only 2.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Matcha or Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds?
Matcha appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Matcha vegan?
No, Matcha is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Matcha and Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds?
There is a difference of 513 calories per 100g between the two products.
