Mccormick tomato vs Kalamata Olive
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Mccormick tomato
Kalamata Olive
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Mccormick tomato and Kalamata Olive side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Mccormick tomato is the clear winner. With 209 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Mccormick tomato takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kalamata Olive contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Mccormick tomato or Kalamata Olive?
Mccormick tomato appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Mccormick tomato vegan?
No, Mccormick tomato is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Mccormick tomato and Kalamata Olive?
There is a difference of 209 calories per 100g between the two products.
