Head-to-Head Analysis

Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp vs Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp

Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added

Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
88.5 kcal
Energy
124 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.4g
Fat
0.4g
20.4g
Protein
29.2g
0.3g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp and Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp or Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added?

It depends on your goals. Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp has 88.4955752212389 calories, while Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added has 124 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp vegan?

No, Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Medium Wild-Caught Pink Shrimp and Solid White Albacore, Wild Tuna, In Water, No Salt Added?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.