Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar vs Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar

Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites

Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
528 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
52.8g
Sugars
43.3g
30.6g
Fat
16.7g
5.6g
Protein
6.7g
0.7g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar and Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 95 more calories per 100g than Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar contains significantly more sugar (52.8g) compared to the milder Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites (43.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar or Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar has 528 calories, while Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Caramel Bar and Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites?

There is a difference of 95 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.