Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk chocolate covered raisins vs Sugar Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk chocolate covered raisins

Milk chocolate covered raisins

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sugar Cookies

Sugar Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
458 kcal
Energy
483 kcal
62.5g
Sugars
27.6g
18.8g
Fat
24.1g
4.2g
Protein
6.9g
0.1g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk chocolate covered raisins and Sugar Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milk chocolate covered raisins is the clear winner. With 25 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk chocolate covered raisins contains significantly more sugar (62.5g) compared to the milder Sugar Cookies (27.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sugar Cookies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk chocolate covered raisins or Sugar Cookies?

It depends on your goals. Milk chocolate covered raisins has 458 calories, while Sugar Cookies has 483 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk chocolate covered raisins vegan?

No, Milk chocolate covered raisins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk chocolate covered raisins and Sugar Cookies?

There is a difference of 25 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.