Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts vs Cocoa Wafers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts

Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cocoa Wafers

Cocoa Wafers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
46.7g
Sugars
0g
33.3g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts and Cocoa Wafers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 533 more calories per 100g than Cocoa Wafers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts contains significantly more sugar (46.7g) compared to the milder Cocoa Wafers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cocoa Wafers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Cocoa Wafers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts or Cocoa Wafers?

It depends on your goals. Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts has 533 calories, while Cocoa Wafers has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts vegan?

No, Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk chocolate Double Dipped Covered Peanuts and Cocoa Wafers?

There is a difference of 533 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.