Head-to-Head Analysis

Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix vs Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix

Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios

Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
607 kcal
68.6g
Sugars
7.1g
10g
Fat
46.4g
5.7g
Protein
21.4g
1.6g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix and Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix is the clear winner. With 207 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix contains significantly more sugar (68.6g) compared to the milder Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix or Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios?

It depends on your goals. Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix has 400 calories, while Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios has 607 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix vegan?

No, Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Milk Chocolate Naturally Flavored Cocoa Mix and Sea Salt and Vinegar Pistachios?

There is a difference of 207 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.