Head-to-Head Analysis

Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count vs Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count

Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps

Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
308 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
38.5g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
32.1g
0g
Protein
3.6g
0.3g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count and Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count is the clear winner. With 228 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count contains significantly more sugar (38.5g) compared to the milder Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count or Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps?

It depends on your goals. Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count has 308 calories, while Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count vegan?

No, Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count and Salt & Vinegar Potato Crisps?

There is a difference of 228 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.