Head-to-Head Analysis

Mountain trail mix vs Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mountain trail mix

Mountain trail mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
0g
26.7g
Fat
28.6g
13.3g
Protein
7.1g
0.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mountain trail mix and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mountain trail mix is the clear winner. With 33 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mountain trail mix contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mountain trail mix offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mountain trail mix or Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Mountain trail mix has 467 calories, while Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mountain trail mix vegan?

No, Mountain trail mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mountain trail mix and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.