Head-to-Head Analysis

Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate vs Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate

Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks

Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
412 kcal
Energy
30 kcal
13.7g
Sugars
0g
11.8g
Fat
2g
51g
Protein
1g
0.8g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate and Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 382 more calories per 100g than Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (13.7g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate offers a protein boost with 51g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate or Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks?

It depends on your goals. Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate has 412 calories, while Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks has 30 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate vegan?

No, Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Multi-Nutrient Formula Chocolate and Sea Salt Seaweed Snacks?

There is a difference of 382 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.