Head-to-Head Analysis

Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) vs Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Multigrain Cereal (Sitter)

Multigrain Cereal (Sitter)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite

Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
20g
Sugars
0g
6.7g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) and Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 400 more calories per 100g than Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) offers a protein boost with 6.6666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) or Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite?

It depends on your goals. Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) has 400 calories, while Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) vegan?

No, Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Multigrain Cereal (Sitter) and Bio 2 Folgemilch Lait de Suite?

There is a difference of 400 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.