Head-to-Head Analysis

Nabisco cookies vs Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Nabisco cookies

Nabisco cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
485 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
39.7g
Sugars
0g
19.1g
Fat
0g
4.4g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nabisco cookies and Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Nabisco cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 480 more calories per 100g than Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Nabisco cookies contains significantly more sugar (39.7g) compared to the milder Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Nabisco cookies offers a protein boost with 4.41g per 100g, outperforming Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nabisco cookies or Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry?

It depends on your goals. Nabisco cookies has 485 calories, while Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nabisco cookies vegan?

No, Nabisco cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nabisco cookies and Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry?

There is a difference of 480 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.