Head-to-Head Analysis

Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz vs Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz

Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit

Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
350 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
37.5g
28.1g
Fat
0g
6.3g
Protein
2.5g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz and Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz is the more energy-dense option here, packing 150 more calories per 100g than Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz takes the lead with only 6.25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit contains 37.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz or Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit?

It depends on your goals. Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz has 500 calories, while Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit has 350 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz vegan?

No, Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nabisco ritz crackers 1x34.300 oz and Straw-Peary Skin-On Dried Fruit?

There is a difference of 150 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.