Head-to-Head Analysis

Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread vs Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread

Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower

Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
211 kcal
Energy
23.5 kcal
57.9g
Sugars
2.4g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
2.4g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread and Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread is the more energy-dense option here, packing 188 more calories per 100g than Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread contains significantly more sugar (57.9g) compared to the milder Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower (2.35g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread or Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower?

It depends on your goals. Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread has 211 calories, while Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower has 23.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread vegan?

No, Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Natural Red Raspberry Fruit Spread and Green Giant Riced Veggies Cauliflower?

There is a difference of 188 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.